St Thomas solves Patterson
Moderators: RocketGirl, Blades
- Port hockey1
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Maroon's
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
The Howard Stern Of The GOJHL. Those who like my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next, Those who dislike my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next.
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:30 pm
- Location: Windsor
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
your not even there like always lol stop whining
End of a era in Leamington
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:17 am
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
Still a big whiner eh port
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
Maybe you should have looked at the final scoresheet cause Sarnia got themselves into penalty trouble off and on during the game and Chatham made them pay for it. SHEESH Port, if you're going to quote stats from PS at least get them straight. Chatham had 18 minutes in penalties, had 7 PP chances and capitalized on 5 of them. Sarnia had 16 minutes of penalties and went 3-8 on the power play. That doesn't look lop-sided to me. Maybe you should have at least listened to the game over the internet before you come in here whining ... yet again ... about the officials.Port hockey1 wrote:6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
Volunteers built Noah's Ark, professionals built the Titanic
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:31 pm
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
The officiating was inconsistent, even with the head of officiating there. After a few blatant missed calls he was seen writing a fair bit. Hamelin tried, it appeared, to make up for some missed calls starting mid second period. Regardless, Chatham battled back for a hard fought shootout win.
- Port hockey1
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Maroon's
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
I posted in the second period!!! My opinion!!!!!Blades wrote:Maybe you should have looked at the final scoresheet cause Sarnia got themselves into penalty trouble off and on during the game and Chatham made them pay for it. SHEESH Port, if you're going to quote stats from PS at least get them straight. Chatham had 18 minutes in penalties, had 7 PP chances and capitalized on 5 of them. Sarnia had 16 minutes of penalties and went 3-8 on the power play. That doesn't look lop-sided to me. Maybe you should have at least listened to the game over the internet before you come in here whining ... yet again ... about the officials.Port hockey1 wrote:6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
The Howard Stern Of The GOJHL. Those who like my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next, Those who dislike my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next.
- Port hockey1
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Maroon's
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
Deleted
Last edited by Port hockey1 on Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Howard Stern Of The GOJHL. Those who like my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next, Those who dislike my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next.
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
Then perhaps you should have included that tidbit of info within your post, the part about it only being sometime in the 2nd period.Port hockey1 wrote:I posted in the second period!!! My opinion!!!!!Blades wrote:Maybe you should have looked at the final scoresheet cause Sarnia got themselves into penalty trouble off and on during the game and Chatham made them pay for it. SHEESH Port, if you're going to quote stats from PS at least get them straight. Chatham had 18 minutes in penalties, had 7 PP chances and capitalized on 5 of them. Sarnia had 16 minutes of penalties and went 3-8 on the power play. That doesn't look lop-sided to me. Maybe you should have at least listened to the game over the internet before you come in here whining ... yet again ... about the officials.Port hockey1 wrote:6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
That being said kudos to the Maroons for their comback win. It still seems no lead is ever enough in Jr. B hockey.
Volunteers built Noah's Ark, professionals built the Titanic
- Port hockey1
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Maroon's
Re: St Thomas solves Patterson
Agreed Blades, and yes I should've mentioned that.
The Howard Stern Of The GOJHL. Those who like my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next, Those who dislike my posts: Wan't to see what I'm going to say next.