Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
Moderators: RocketGirl, Blades
Maybe you should have looked at the final scoresheet cause Sarnia got themselves into penalty trouble off and on during the game and Chatham made them pay for it. SHEESH Port, if you're going to quote stats from PS at least get them straight. Chatham had 18 minutes in penalties, had 7 PP chances and capitalized on 5 of them. Sarnia had 16 minutes of penalties and went 3-8 on the power play. That doesn't look lop-sided to me. Maybe you should have at least listened to the game over the internet before you come in here whining ... yet again ... about the officials.Port hockey1 wrote:6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
I posted in the second period!!! My opinion!!!!!Blades wrote:Maybe you should have looked at the final scoresheet cause Sarnia got themselves into penalty trouble off and on during the game and Chatham made them pay for it. SHEESH Port, if you're going to quote stats from PS at least get them straight. Chatham had 18 minutes in penalties, had 7 PP chances and capitalized on 5 of them. Sarnia had 16 minutes of penalties and went 3-8 on the power play. That doesn't look lop-sided to me. Maybe you should have at least listened to the game over the internet before you come in here whining ... yet again ... about the officials.Port hockey1 wrote:6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.
Then perhaps you should have included that tidbit of info within your post, the part about it only being sometime in the 2nd period.Port hockey1 wrote:I posted in the second period!!! My opinion!!!!!Blades wrote:Maybe you should have looked at the final scoresheet cause Sarnia got themselves into penalty trouble off and on during the game and Chatham made them pay for it. SHEESH Port, if you're going to quote stats from PS at least get them straight. Chatham had 18 minutes in penalties, had 7 PP chances and capitalized on 5 of them. Sarnia had 16 minutes of penalties and went 3-8 on the power play. That doesn't look lop-sided to me. Maybe you should have at least listened to the game over the internet before you come in here whining ... yet again ... about the officials.Port hockey1 wrote:6 Chatham penalties compared to one for Sarnia...Plus a penalty shot for Sarnia.
Don't even need to be there to know how terrible the officials are tonight.
Bushleague reffing.