BillyTheKid wrote:Port hockey1 wrote:.....................
If you want to get into an argument about a game that you were there and witnessed then that's fine but don't rip on a game that you didnt even watch. Unless you know somebody that was there and they told you. I was asking a simple question because I was going to ask you how O"Keefe looked since going back to jr c that's all. But you will be able to tell me that just by going on point streak right ?
All I'm saying is something was up with that game. And that's just my opinion. I wouldn't know about O'Keefe, as I've only been to a pair of C games earlier this season. Dunnville looked awful both games.
And my reply was done so with a lot of sarcasm, that's why the icons were there. I have no problem being told I'm wrong when I am. But in this situation, only people who attended that game can tell me I was wrong. Anyone who wasn't can disagree with my take, and even add their take if they wish to.
If you would like to know how I know this ref had a vendetta based on the boxscore, just look at it closely. Then compare it to past Glanbrook games. The first two periods, sure maybe that's a fluke. But in the third, only one side gets a roughing & inciting penalty. Then the next couple of calls include abuse of officials penalties.
What are the chances their opponents, who normally take penalty's like the other teams, played a flawless game. So flawless that their kid did nothing while his opponent was roughing him. Then said nothing after his opponent started yapping at him. And so flawless that Glanbrook players were clearly wondering why they were the only team being called in the third period, hence the abuse of officials calls after several penalties.
That's where my opinion comes from. But everyone is entitled to their own takes on things.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)